‘Israel Gave White House Its Demands for Ending War in Lebanon’ – Report 

UN Special Envoy Amos Hochstein. (Design: Palestine Chronicle)

By Palestine Chronicle Staff  

The Israeli official also said that Israel demanded its air force “have freedom of operation in Lebanese air space.”

Israel provided the United States with a document last week with its conditions for a diplomatic solution to end the war in Lebanon, Axios reported on Sunday, citing two US officials and two Israeli officials.

According to the Israeli officials, Israeli Premier Benjamin Netanyahu’s office handed the document to the White House ahead of President Biden’s envoy Amos Hochstein’s visit to Beirut on Monday to discuss a diplomatic solution to the conflict.

Among the Israeli conditions is that the Israeli army “be allowed to engage in ‘active enforcement’ to make sure Hezbollah doesn’t rearm and rebuild its military infrastructure in the areas of southern Lebanon that are close to the border,” Axios said.

The Israeli official also said that Israel demanded its air force “have freedom of operation in Lebanese air space.”

According to the Israeli newspaper Walla, citing an informed American source, Israeli conditions are unlikely to be approved.

Contradicts UN Resolution 1701

The two demands, Axios pointed out, contradict UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which states that the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) enforce a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah.

“We are talking about 1701 with increased enforcement. Our main message is that if the Lebanese army and UNIFIL do more, the IDF will do less and the other way around”, the Israeli official reportedly said.

The report added that a US official said it was “highly unlikely that Lebanon and the international community would agree to these conditions, which would dramatically undermine Lebanon’s sovereignty.”

‘Working on Formula’

Hochstein told a press conference in Beirut on Monday that neither Lebanon nor Israel “ever fully implemented resolution 1701, which ‘contributed to the conflict we are witnessing today’,” the Axios report said.

“We are working on a formula that will end the conflict once and for all so that it won’t start again next month or next year,” Hochstein stated.

‘Last Chance before Elections’

Hochstein earlier met with Lebanese officials, including acting prime minister Najib Mikati and Speaker of Parliament Nabih Berri to discuss the Israeli demands.

According to Axios, Berri told Al-Arabiya on Sunday that Hochstein’s visit was “the last chance before the US elections to reach a solution” to the war in Lebanon.

The United Nations Interim Force In Lebanon (UNIFIL) accused Israel on Sunday of deliberately demolishing one of its observation towers and a perimeter fence in Marwahin, in Tyre, south of Lebanon.

In a statement, UNIFIL slammed Israel for violating a UN position and sabotaging its properties labeling the Israeli assault as “a flagrant violation of international law and Security Council resolution 1701.”

There have been at least three attacks on the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon by Israeli occupation forces since its ground invasion began earlier this month.

(The Palestine Chronicle)

(The Palestine Chronicle is a registered 501(c)3 organization, thus, all donations are tax deductible.)
Our Vision For Liberation: Engaged Palestinian Leaders & Intellectuals Speak Out

2 Comments

  1. Why would it be up to the scumbag US government to end it? unless it’s been their war the whole time, which is obviously true. So, to re-cap…
    MY GOVERNMENT, aided the slaughter of first graders, for ” Israel ” . with OUR money, and OUR weaponry. We The People are sick of the scumbags and what they’ve done. We need to vote them out. No more Bidens, Trumps, NO Kamala, no Michelle Obama…nobody for POTUS. They’re only a figurehead anyway.

  2. The problem with that UNSC resolution is that it accepts the US label of Hizbullah as a “terrorist” organization, thus it seeks to push Hizbullah out of the way. The way historians who respect the truth see it, in 1982 the IDF invaded Lebanon, not Hizbullah Israel. Hizbullah was a very successful resistance movement, and for that the US libels them as “terrorists”? If we assign labels according to actions instead of preconceptions, it’s the IDF that should be kept at least 100 kilometres from any border.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*