By John V. Whitbeck
June 5 marked the 48th anniversary of the “preemptive” attack on Egypt with which Israel launched the fateful “Six-Day War” that permitted the Zionist movement to complete its conquest of historical Palestine.
As the “State of Palestine” (the legal designation for the 22% of historical Palestine conquered in 1967, which is now recognized as a state by 136 other states and the United Nations) enters its 49th year of an apparently perpetual occupation by the State of Israel, the Israeli government and its friends in the United States are mobilizing to fight a new war – a “Legitimacy War” against the “delegitimization” of “Israel”.
The quotation marks around “Israel” are intended to emphasize a fundamental point: When Israelis and their friends speak of the “delegitimization” of Israel or of Israel’s “right to exist”, they are not referring to the legitimacy or continued existence of any physical territory or of any group of people. They are referring to the legitimacy or continued existence of the particular ethno-religious-supremacist political system established in 1948 on the territory previously named Palestine, a territory in which the current population is roughly 50% Jewish and 50% Palestinian.
Why has “delegitimization” suddenly become such an existential threat to “Israel”?
Until relatively recently, very few people seriously questioned the continued existence of “Israel” – either because they considered the ethnic cleansing of Palestine and the dispossession and dispersal of the Palestinian people to make room for a “Jewish State” to be a good thing or because they considered it, like the genocide of the indigenous peoples of North America to make room for European colonists and their African slaves, to be a irreversible injustice, not worth thinking about any more.
Until relatively recently, the world’s attention has been focused on ending the occupation of the portion of Palestine conquered in 1967, in large part because that more recent injustice was assumed to be reversible through a “two-state solution”.
However, as Israeli leaders have become more honest and explicit about the perpetual nature of their occupation of the State of Palestine and about their deeply held belief that there is no difference between the portion of Palestine conquered in 1948 and the portion of Palestine conquered in 1967, both being their god’s gift to them and to them alone, the world’s attention has begun to broaden, both regarding the possibilities of the future and regarding the realities of the past.
In the face of the clear Israeli intention to maintain the current undemocratic and discriminatory system of “one state with two systems”, many people have started to look again at the seminal injustice, the original sin, of 1948 and at the inherent nature of political Zionism and to think seriously about the desirability of reforming and transforming ethno-religious-supremacist “Israel” into a fully democratic state with equal rights and human dignity for all who live there – the same political system which Western governments profess and proclaim to be the ideal form of government for all other states.
Of course, nothing would be more likely to make Israelis question the sustainability of their very comfortable status quo and become seriously interested in actually achieving a decent “two-state solution” than a realization that both Western public opinion and Western governments are starting to question both the “rightness” of how “Israel” came into existence and the legitimacy in the 21st century of an ethno-religious-supremacist regime, whether it calls itself “the Jewish State” or “the Islamic State”.
Hence the sudden rise of the existential threat of the “delegitimization” of “Israel”.
No one has done more to delegitimize “Israel” in the eyes of the world than Prime Minister Netanyahu.
Perhaps those who seek equal rights, equal human dignity and some measure of justice, whether in two states or in one, should hope that Mr. Netanyahu keeps up his good work in the “Legitimacy War”.
– John V. Whitbeck is an international lawyer who has advised the Palestinian negotiating team in negotiations with Israel. He contributed this article to PalestineChronicle.com.
Of course, if we question the “delegitimization” of the legitimacy or continued existence of the particular ethno-religious-supremacist political system, then the logical consequence of the Zionist entity as a practical application of the Zionist ideology, we touch the right chord to which the Zionists react hysterically! As I have already had occasion to write it and say it at conferences, it isn’t because the Zionist entity has existed for decades that we must accept it as a fact to which we can’t touch. The Zionist entity is based on theft and lies, it can bring nothing good. The only just solution is the dismantling of the Zionist entity, the return of the stolen lands and goods … and
… and the return of the exiles. We must uproot the evil, the ideology of Zionism, not just cut down the weeds (by making of the Zionists friendly Democrats). Zionism infiltrates everywhere, not just in the Zionist entity; there are also all the Zionist lobbies which dominate secretly charities, and even use Jewish communities, claiming to represent “all the Jews” (What a lie!) ! As an anti-Zionist Orthodox Jewish woman, I refer to the promises of the Almighty through the Prophets in the Thora; not only, will it remain nothing of the stones of the buildings that Zionists will
…it will remain nothing of the stones of the buildings that Zionists will have built, but also their memory will be erased.